US dollar damaged by Fed’s cautious removal of patience

<p>The Federal Reserve dropped its pledge to be ‘patient’ in normalizing monetary policy, while its latest economic forecasts suggest that Fed members “will not be […]</p>

The Federal Reserve dropped its pledge to be ‘patient’ in normalizing monetary policy, while its latest economic forecasts suggest that Fed members “will not be impatient” in acting on rates. The Fed’s summary of economic projections were downgraded for GDP growth and infation, alongside unemployment. The US dollar index plunged 3% due to a swift repricing of interest rate normalization by currency and bond traders. EURUSD soared to $1.1043 from a low of $1.0580, a rally not seen in recent years.

Downgrading growth and inflation

Central tendency forecasts for 2015 GDP were lowered to 2.3-2.7% from 2.6-3% in December as were those for 2016 GDP to 2.3-2.7% from prior 2.5-3%. Forecasts for 2015 inflation — as measured by core PCE price index was lowered to 1.3-1.4% from 1.5-1.8%. The 2015 view for the unemployment rate was reduced to 5.0-5.2% from 5.2-5.3%.

Median Fed Funds forecast by end of 2015 was reduced to 0.625% from 1.125% and seen at 1.875% by end of 2016 from the prior 2.5% forecast, which remains more hawkish than the rate priced  in the bond market. Only 2 of the Fed’s 17 members continue to see no rate hike in 2015.

Why the Fed bothered dropping “patience”?

And so if the Fed signaled such a downbeat view on the economy, why did it bother to remove the “patient” phrase on normalizing rates? The aim was to tell markets it is ready to raise rates as early as this year, but was not in a hurry to do so, and remained bound by further progress in the data, rather than progress in the calendar. The Fed added a new guidance with emphasis on seeing inflation improve.  It stated: “…that it will be appropriate to raise the target range for the federal funds rate when it has seen further improvement in the labor market and is reasonably confident that inflation will move back to its 2 percent objective over the medium term.  This change in the forward guidance does not indicate that the Committee has decided on the timing of the initial increase in the target range.”

Such veiled emphasis on inflation normalization tells us that even if employment has been rising at an average monthly rate of +200K  and unemployment well below 6%, it would be inappropriate to raise rates without inflation starting to trend higher towards the 2.0% objective.

About that US dollar

International developments were kept in the FOMC statement since being added in the January statement, referring to the slowdown in China, eurozone and disinflationary dynamics arising from this regions via the strong US dollar. Yellen noted she expected “…net exports to serve as a notable drag” on the economy, mainly due to “recent appreciation of the dollar“.  Today’s 3% plunge in the greenback resulted from a hard repricing of interest rate normalization by currency and bond traders, which will slow down the pace of the plunging euro and deteriorating carry costs of Asian (and other EM) investors who owe USD-based loans from their depreciating currencies.

And if you think the Fed’s removal of patience marks a new step closer to hiking rates, you could thing again. In December 2012, the Fed added the guidance of telling markets it would not raise rates before unemployment fell below 6.5%. As unemployment fall neared 6.5%, the Fed said it wouldn’t raise rates until a “considerable time” elapsed following the end of QE3 –or end of asset purchase program. Such time was suggested to be 6-9 months.  Once the Fed completed bond purchases in December, it said it would be “patient” about raising rates. Now that “patient” is gone, the Fed has reverted to a general statement about unemployment and inflation.


Build your confidence risk free
Join our live webinars for the latest analysis and trading ideas. Register now

StoneX Financial Ltd (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.

No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.

For further details see our full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.