Twitter shares set to dive on Wednesday as market turns sceptical
Ken Odeluga July 29, 2015 5:24 AM
<p>Updated 1419 BST For Wall Street, Twitter’s Q2 results on Tuesday night were what would normally have counted as a ‘big beat’ compared to expectations. […]</p>
Updated 1419 BST
For Wall Street, Twitter’s Q2 results on Tuesday night were what would normally have counted as a ‘big beat’ compared to expectations.
But looking at after-hours trading in the stock, when a rise of more than 5% during the main session turned into a fall of about 11%, it seems Twitter’s infamous recent troubles have turned investors more sceptical.
The sell-off overnight underlines our view that Twitter’s stock is highly overvalued, on a purely financial basis.
At the very least, investors appeared to have thought more critically about Twitter’s share price and were not as satisfied with the firm’s relative financial and subscriber growth as they had been in the past.
Read our in-house analysis of Twitter’s valuation here.
Twitter Q2 results summary
- Earnings per share (EPS) – 7 cents vs. 2c in Q2 2014; (4-6c expected)
- GAAP EPS – 21 cents loss per share vs. -24c in Q2 2014; (-27c expected)
- Net loss – $136.7m vs. $144m net loss in Q2 2014
- Revenue – up 61% to $502.4m; ($481m expected)
- 2015 revenue guidance raised to $2.20bn-$2.27bn; (previously $2.17bn-$2.27bn)
- Monthly Active Users (MAU) up 15% to 316 million; (310 million expected)
Twitter’s earnings per share (EPS) excluding certain exceptional items and costs, beat analysts’ average expectation in the second quarter ending in June.
EPS came in at 7 cents compared with The Street view of 6 cents, even though analysts had revised up their earnings forecasts in the days ahead of the release
The average EPS call had edged up to 6 cents in recent days from 4 cents previously.
The revenue outcome was also above the range of consensus forecasts.
Sales were 68% higher, using a constant currency rate, to adjust for the dollar’s strength, and 61% up on a reported basis to $502.4m—$481m was expected.
The net loss was narrower year-on-year.
$136.7m was burnt in the second quarter compared with the minus-$144.6m result in the same quarter a year before.
Elsewhere, Twitter also slightly redeemed itself on guidance.
After having cut its own forecast of annual revenue when it released Q1 results in April to a $2.17bn-$2.27bn range, the social media network lifted the lower end of that range on Tuesday evening to $2.20bn.
During the post-earnings conference call, there was a marked tone of soul searching and contriteness from Twitter’s interim CEO, co-founder Jack Dorsey, especially about sluggish Monthly Active User (MAU) growth, which Dorsey and CFO Anthony Noto, who also spoke, admitted was not satisfactory.
As has been the case in recent quarters, the crucial MAU metric showed less than reassuring progress, with the count at 316 million on average in Q2, 15% higher year-on-year, but stagnating compared to the first quarter against which the rise was just 3%.
It was Twitter’s slowest MAU growth since its stock was floated. This is significant, since MAU’s are the most crucial metric in this space, without decent subscriber growth, one has to wonder where future growth for Twitter will come from.
Still, analysts’ views had been much more pessimistic about user growth, and it was perhaps not too great a hurdle for TWTR to beat them—just 310 million was forecast, according to data gathered by by FactSet.
Twitter “not mass market” yet
Additionally, whilst both Dorsey and Noto struck a more bullish and optimistic tone about recently introduced service offerings and advertising revenue prospects in the later quarters of the year, they accepted they needed to execute fixes more swiftly and that in their view, Twitter had so far not made the jump to what they called “mass market” users.
They also reiterated the company’s damped expectation from Q1 about direct-response ads.
For instance, whilst Twitter boasted that its newly integrated digital monitoring acquisition, Tell Apart, produced $12m in sales in the few weeks since it was consolidated, direct ad initiatives had still not achieved intended goals.
Dorsey said Twitter had been “very successful at monetization with a strong Q2″.
But he added: “product initiatives we’ve mentioned in previous initiatives earnings calls…have not yet had meaningful impact on growing our audience”.
Finally, as per wide expectations, Twitter said it had still not yet found a permanent CEO.
Dorsey said he did “not have an update”, nor was a clear time frame offered during which a new CEO might be hired.
Blue bird to fall on Wednesday
This smattering of negative elements that accompanied Twitter’s better-than-expected earnings brought the stock’s rise of more than 5% on Tuesday to a halt.
It’s worth noting the stock in fact stalled at resistance between c. $36.80 to c. $36.50.
That barrier has held TWTR back for virtually the entire four months since a combination of bad luck and bad earnings slashed Twitter’s market value by almost a third in a just few days during late April-early May.
Combining this chart resistance with the company’s lacklustre Q2 update, suggests the deep sell-off in Twitter shares seen in the specially extended ‘after hours’ market, is likely to follow-through into Wednesday’s main session.
Lows of at least $34.15 that have repeatedly drawn TWTR back for more than a month could be seen, if the better part of Tuesday’s gains are lost.
Please click image to enlarge
StoneX Financial Ltd (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.
No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.