The Next Meaningful Sell-off
City Index July 20, 2012 9:00 PM
<p>Chatter is already making the rounds (from an advisory firm) that a few dovish Fed members are drumming up support for further QE. It is […]</p>
Chatter is already making the rounds (from an advisory firm) that a few dovish Fed members are drumming up support for further QE. It is inevitable that such rumours will resurface ahead of the Jackson Hole Fed conference of world central bankers in August.
Equity indices may be selling off after three consecutive rising days, but this week’s shrugging of poor data by equities cannot be ignored. Equities’ resilience to pervasively negative economic data (US and abroad) is taking a life of its own.
Nine-month lows in the US June leading economic indicators index, eight-month lows in US existing home sales and double digit negative reading in the June Philly Fed index—all on the back of the third consecutive monthly decline in US retail sales should be sufficiently negative for equities. Yet indices were still up 2.7-3.0% since Monday.
Whether the rationale is based on the inevitability of further stimulus action from the Fed/ECB, or the avoidance of “horrible scenarios” in US corporate earnings, the resilience of equities cannot be ignored as technicals suggest further gains into the end of summer.
The resurfacing inverse relation between equities and global 10-year yields over the past four weeks backs the aforementioned rationale– Ongoing data weakness has globalised the easing campaign of major central banks, and raising traders’ confidence, thereby driving yields lower and lifting equities higher. US 10-year bond yields have fallen a remarkable 17 bps from the June 22 high of 1.67% to 1.49%.
When’s The Next Meaningful Sell-off? We may not see the next “meaningful” decline in equities until both the manufacturing and services ISMs fall below 50 and extend their fall below 45.0. So far, the services ISM has not yet fallen under 50.0. Even a decline below 50 may prove a 1-time affair before subsequently regaining 50.0–as we saw in January 2007. Thus, only a reading of 47 in both ISMs would be a meaningful red-flag.
The seldom-discussed Leading Economic Indicators index has long been frowned upon by Wall Street as a misleading indicators index, but the chart below show consistency during recessions. Yesterday’s release showed -0.3% in June, the biggest decline in nine months. The LEI index would have to post a monthly decline of 0.6 to 0.7% in order for it to be accompanied with sufficient macroeconomic deterioration and escalating bearishness in equities. The chart shows declines of 0.6%-0.7% in the LEI were consistent with bear markets in equities and recessions. In order to a decline of such magnitude in the LEI and both ISMs under 48-47, this may have to wait until Q4, which is a fitting time for markets to demand additional Fed stimulus to the existing Operation Twist-such as QE. Interestingly, chatter is already making the rounds (from an advisory firm) that a few dovish Fed members are drumming up support for further QE before year-end.
GAIN Capital UK Limited (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.
No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.