Amazon shares may face an unforgiving response to anything other than stellar earnings
TESLA Q3 RESULTS REVIEWED
So far, investor reactions to the rising flood of earnings from key fast-growing U.S. firms have been all over the map. There isn’t much of a plausible pattern to be discerned. Tesla’s around-20% surge following, admittedly, a surprise profit when a loss was expected, ought, arguably to have been moderated by the quite dodgy year-on-year numbers.
- Key Q3 auto sales fell 12% year-on-year
- Operating income collapsed -37% y/y
- Key auto gross margin slipped 297 basis points, even though group gross margin widened faster than expected
In short, a beat of questionable quality. Though this is Tesla. Its investor reactions are often ‘non-standard’.
TWITTER Q3 RESULTS REVIEWED
Meanwhile, user growth changed from being the most important metric for judging Twitter’s quarterly performance, apparently, judging by an around 20% sell-off even as the group posted active user gains above market expectations. True, both revenues and EPS disappointed. And the group’s admission that a ‘bug’ had been accessing user data without permission to the benefit of ad revenues was a shock, whilst the ‘around 3%’ revenue impact of ending assistance from the glitch is significant, given overall growth of 9% in Q3.
But it’s difficult to envisage user growth and ad sales momentum seen over the last several quarters simply evaporating. Progress would have to grind to a halt and reverse to justify the toasting of around $5bn in TWTR market value seen on Thursday.
MICROSOFT Q1 RESULTS REVIEWED
Then there’s Microsoft, whose revenue growth beat all estimates, on continued solid performances across all business lines, but driven by Intelligent Cloud. The cloud opportunity continues to be widely recognised as far bigger than existing growth. True, the rate of that growth is moderating, as the enterprise cloud market matures. Yet superior positioning suggests MSFT can still weather any economic storm better than hardware and cloud rivals.
The shares’ modest 2% rise just now has an eye to a more cautious outlook than some investors expected. As well, cloud flagship Azure’s 59% sales growth disappointed the highest expectations. A lack of surprises also explains the subdued reaction.
All told, so far, investor responses to earnings from leading high-beta and fast-growing U.S. firms look rather idiosyncratic. A recently discussed shift to quality isn’t on show, looking at modest Microsoft buying. Yet the post-earnings moves may also be called disproportionate. These conditions point to a possible unforgiving reaction to FAANG laggard Amazon, which reports in a while, unless its third-quarter report has shock and awe. The stock remains highly rated given that it’s up 18% this year, though it’s gain lags behind the Nasdaq’s 25% advance, and more importantly most big tech counterparts. Read an earnings preview for AMZN and other big tech names here.
GAIN Capital UK Limited (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.
No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.