S&P 500’s 200-day trend is both friend and foe

The U.S. benchmark index looks set to flirt with its critical trend gauge again sometime soon

The U.S. benchmark index looks set to flirt with its critical trend gauge again sometime soon

Among technical chart indicators that have appeal beyond the realm of seasoned traders, perhaps the S&P 500’s 200-day moving average is ‘up there’. If anything, since the global stock market’s expansion began from a March 2009 bottom, the gauge of the U.S. market’s health over a business year has gained even greater prominence. Over that stretch, the fiercest market corrections—let’s say when the VIX Volatility Index hit 40 or higher—have coincided with SPX ‘officially’ no longer in an uptrend. In other words, when the S&P 500 was well below its 200-day average.

So, from a technical chart perspective, there are well-founded reasons to take the S&P 500’s latest approach to the threshold very seriously.

More positively, the import of the 200-DMA, cuts both ways. Chiefly, the gauge is a well-known support, with demonstrable resilience. With U.S. economic counters conspicuously holding their ground, by and large, whilst those in other developed economies turn definitively lower, it may be some time before SPX’s 200-DMA sounds any alarms. Note that when SPX approached its 200-DMA in March and June it rebounded sharply.

The difference between then and now is that that the U.S. stock market gauge is rounding off a month of sideways consolidation. We can demarcate the range between the 2945.50 high of 2nd August and 2822.12 low a day later. Since then, price has narrowly avoided going lower on at least three clear occasions, but it has not managed to get higher either.

Classically, technical analysis tends to view moves as stronger if they are preceded by a period when energy has metaphorically been building up.

Further circumstantial negatives include that closely related peer indices of the S&P 500 are faring worse, relative to their 200-day moving averages. The equal-weighted S&P 500, Midcap 400, Small Cap 600 and Russell 2000 have all fallen significantly more this month than SPX.

As for SPX’s near-term outlook, the lower bound of the range outlined above is the most critical level.

Note that the 3rd August low of 2822 we mentioned was an almost identical echo of a low on 6th June. Raising the stakes even higher, that low was the launch point of SPX’s most confident vault in the second half of the year so far. The move peaked seven weeks later and 7.3% higher at 3013 on 26th July.

Any break down and out of the range will heighten expectations of a challenge against the index’s 200-day moving average.

Unsettling vibrations—AKA volatility—can only ratchet higher under those circumstances.

S&P 500 – daily

Source: Bloomberg/City Index

Build your confidence risk free
Join our live webinars for the latest analysis and trading ideas. Register now

StoneX Financial Ltd (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.

No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.

For further details see our full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.