Sainsbury’s shares barely rise despite ‘outperformance’

Sainsbury’s has scrapped separate supermarket like-for-like sales data. Why?

Unfortunately, the first thing that caught our eye in Sainsbury’s closely watched first quarter report was that it has decided to scrap separate supermarket like-for-like sales.

Sainsbury’s has been the clear underperformer in underlying food sales among Britain’s large grocers for coming up to about a year, so the move to consolidate same-store Argos and supermarket figures inevitably raises the question of whether the group is window dressing. Either way, underlying grocery sales growth is a vital measure for investors. The removal of the information is not progressive in our view.

As it is, total like-for-like sales growth of 2.3% (excluding fuel) in the first quarter suggests improvement at both Argos and the supermarket. Note combined underlying sales growth of 0.3% in Q4, when food fell 0.5% and the catalogue chain rose 4.3%. It’s still possible food remained mildly negative in Q1 though; Argos growth is clearly faster and more sure-footed than Sainsbury’s grocery sales.

The Argos success story looks to be continuing apace, though with General Merchandise slipping 50 basis points to 1% compared to Q4, it looks likely that larger specialists like Carphone Warehouse are beginning to take back the upper hand with mix changes and other efficiencies. Seasonal effects in Argos’s wider set of categories (including toys) may partly account for the softening. Still Carphone’s finance director last week gave an unquantified “solid” rating to underlying growth since April. It’s a reminder that Sainsbury’s one clear avenue of positive retail development will not go unchallenged.

Elsewhere, the 7.2% rise of Clothing reduces worries about seasonal effects and competition against in-house supermarket retail rivals and even high street fashion chains. We do however think differing mixes at Sainsbury’s main rivals are valid qualifications of its claim to have outperformed general and clothing retailers. With shares easing off an opening rise of 1.5%, investors appear to have taken a similarly restrained view, to that and to the group’s affirmations about optimising prices with suppliers.

More promisingly, the group’s response to questions about a possible move on Nisa remains wisely tight-lipped. The stock’s relative outperformance against Tesco and Morrisons so far this year—up a percentage point at last check—is anything but invulnerable, and the group seems aware that it has convincing on the merits of more M&A so soon after Home Retail.

It’s worth noting that full-year profit guidance has been edged lower this morning: in May finance director Kevin O’Byrne was “comfortable” with a consensus estimate of £573m. He’s still comfortable, though the figure he states on Tuesday is £572m.

In short, Sainsbury’s has managed to keep playing successfully to its main strength—Argos—so far this year. But it continues to look exposed both to more sharply honed grocery competition and as larger electricals retailers widen their mix away from highly sensitive white goods categories. Unfortunately, there’s little in Sainsbury’s update that suggests its stock will not join those of its rivals in the red for the year.

Even a cursory glance at Sainsbury’s stock price chart should make clear why we are quite a bit less impressed by its progress in the quarter than its management, which stated that “General Merchandise and Clothing, including Argos outperformed the market”.

  • On Tuesday the stock toyed with marking the return of half of its rise off post referendum-day lows equating to about 247.6p
  • Even if the stock turns out to have merely skimmed that price, the breakdown of the shares from a channel in place since midsummer last year is a bearish motif in itself
  • In more prosaic terms, the loss of lower trend line support implied by the break could expose the shares to a deeper fall than its 10.7% decline off highs for the year (on 26th May) of 283.6p. (It’s notable that the shares have performed as poorly as those of its rival Tesco since that date)
  • SBRY has also further perforated support at 251p-248p, the base of a consolidation range with a ceiling largely at 277.4p
  • Investors and traders with experience of observing this stock in context of its main British rivals will be aware of its track record of frequently trading below its 200-day moving average, a primary trend marker for many market participants. Frequent bisection of the threshold and even long spells of the average acting as a resistance, as in Sainsbury’s case, can point to a persistent discount that starts to appear structural
  • Currently both Sainsbury's and Tesco shares are trading below their 200-day MAs, whilst Morrisons has managed to stay above its own
  • A more positive view of the shares would be possible if they managed to remain above the 251p-248p band mentioned earlier, though on a technical and fundamental basis, we’re pessimistic about the chances of the stock doing so

DAILY CHART: SAINSBURY’S PLC.

Source: Thomson Reuters and City Index


Join our live webinars for the latest analysis and trading ideas. Register now

GAIN Capital UK Limited (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.

No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.

For further details see our full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.