Royal Mail shares climb on second-class update

<p>Royal Mail Group’s trading update looks disappointing in almost all respects, apart from a seasonal rise in parcel volumes that’s enabled the former state-owned monopoly […]</p>

Royal Mail Group’s trading update looks disappointing in almost all respects, apart from a seasonal rise in parcel volumes that’s enabled the former state-owned monopoly to say it will hit full-year expectations.

Still, that was enough to set the shares on their best rally since November, with the stock rising as much as 5% on Thursday.

 

This is the market’s reaction to RMG painting a positive tone on its outlook, even if the news is only relatively promising rather than showing outright progress.

Here’s why:

  • The 1% revenue rise of over the reporting period ending in 28th December represents a further slowdown compared with the half-year report
  • Improvement in the UK parcels business, but the 3% volume uplift there was partly driven by usual seasonal gains
  • Royal Mail letter volumes fell 3% during the period
  • Little in RMG’s statement to suggest a sustainable parcels revival (after RMG highlighted fierce competition in its half-year report, from e-Commerce companies, especially Amazon)
  • RMG hasn’t capitalised much from notable failures and closures of rival UK delivery firms
  • UK Mail Group Plc. handled record deliveries into Christmas, a clear sign market share was transferred to it

 

Flat parcels

On that more relative basis mentioned earlier, which is currently being well-received by the market, divisional parcel growth has risen back to flat following the 1% fall seen at the half-year stage.

This is expected to enable Royal Mail to report full-year results in line with expectations.

Consensus forecasts currently foresee full-year net income of about £159.44m.

 

 

Royal Mail still sees “overcapacity”

On a more absolute, perhaps shorter-term perspective though, we continue to regard RMG as too hamstrung by legacy constrictions and the over-resourced practices of a formerly public-owned monopoly.

Smaller, nimbler rivals with tighter cost structures and flexible resources will continue to pick off aspects of RMG’s business due to their ability to survive on much thinner margins, in our view.

Are there compelling reasons to expect Royal Mail’s 50%-revenue earner, parcels, to recover back to its recent run-rate growth of 4%-5%?

We doubt it. 1%-2%, or even lower is likelier.

In a statement accompanying Royal Mail’s figures, CEO Moya Greene expressed confidence “that the outcome for the full year will be in line with expectations”.

However she later stressed during an interview with Reuters news agency that pressures were expected to continue.

“The conditions of overcapacity and too many players chasing traffic (are) going to continue to put pressure on prices for the next couple of years,” Greene said.

 

Reality check overhead

It seems plausible to me these factors will continue to dampen sentiment on the stock, keeping it below important Fibonacci levels, confirmed resistance and even perhaps the 200-day moving average, for the medium term at least.

 

ROYAL MAIL DAILY 9-MTH RESULTS 22ND JAN

 

There’s little doubt the current bullish tilt of the stock is strongly present on shorter-term time frames too.

Traders of City Index’s Daily Funded Trade are bidding up the contract in the same way as the market stock.

Our MACD Zero Cross trading system last signalled a long entry on Wednesday morning, which has in this case been corroborated.

In a similar way to the underlying stock, I do expect the DFT to be challenged on the upside at the points marked. I also note momentum currently looks stretched on the upside.

 

ROYAL MAIL DFT 9-MTH RESULTS 22ND JAN

 

Join our live webinars for the latest analysis and trading ideas. Register now

GAIN Capital UK Limited (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.

No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.

For further details see our full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.