A committee of MPs has criticised the government for undervaluing the Royal Mail during its sale.
Headed up by Labour MP Adrian Bailey the committee stated that taxpayers could have lost out on about £1 billion thanks a "significant underestimate" by the government. The Business, Innovation and Skills select committee suggest that when the Royal Mail was floated on the stock market the decision was taken on bad advice.
Members stated that the shares had been undervalued and property owned by the Royal Mail was mispriced, especially when 60 per cent of the organisation was privatised in October. At the point of stock flotation, shares in the Royal Mail were priced a 330p but this increased to a peak of 618p but has since fallen to 473p.
Speaking to the BBC, Mr Bailey said: "We believe that fear of failure and poor quality advice led to a significant underestimate of the demand for Royal Mail shares. Ultimately the blame must lie with the government. The buck stops with government.
"But it's quite clear they were very badly advised and obviously it does calls into question the whole process by which the advisors were appointed and the quality of advice the government received."
Business secretary Vince Cable defended the government's decision and explained that the Royal Mail was sold at a price which was regarded as the "best that could be achieved". He noted that £2 billion had already been paid to taxpayers and stressed that share prices are very volatile.
Earlier in the week, Mr Cable accepted the demands from the National Audit Office and ordered a review of the listing process which has the organisation believes has cost the taxpayer millions of pounds.
Royal Mail's share price currently stands at 473.90p as 08:58 on July 11th, after experiencing a 0.15 per cent drop.
Find up to date information on the FTSE 100 and spread betting strategies at City Index.
StoneX Financial Ltd (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.
No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.