Royal Mail highlights challenges

<p>Shares of Royal Mail declined some 9.7% (at time of writing) following the company’s market update today (22nd May). A warning from Moya Greene, the […]</p>

Shares of Royal Mail declined some 9.7% (at time of writing) following the company’s market update today (22nd May). A warning from Moya Greene, the company’s CEO, certainly didn’t help.

For its year ended 30th March, Royal Mail took revenue of around £9.5bn, up from some £9.2bn reported in the same period last year.

Operating profit (before “transformation costs”) came in at £671m, marking a 12% increase over the same period last year.

After said transformation costs – this includes provisions relating to its management reorganisation programme – operating profit stood at £430m, up from last year’s £403m.

The company saw growth across its businesses, including its core – UK parcels, International & Letters (UKPIL) – where growth in parcel revenue helped offset the decline in letter revenue.

Here’s the challenge for Royal Mail…

According to the company’s CEO, Royal Mail’s headwinds are twofold.

Fierce competition in parcel delivery was noted as one headwind.

Well, that’s pretty much well known and was somewhat apparent in its latest figures – parcel volumes were flat year-on-year.

That’s certainly a problem given that letter delivery is on the decline, which means future growth lies with parcel delivery (helped by e-commerce).

Still, the company is taking a number of steps to fight back; including its planned Sunday delivery service.

Then there’s competition on the letters side…

That, in the absence of “timely regulatory action”, could hurt the sustainability of its Universal Service (a six-day-a-week delivery service across the whole country, for which it has an obligation) and therefore its targeted profit margin range.

The competition, of course, is from TNT Post UK, which has been expanding its direct delivery letter service (customer to recipient delivery using its own network). It now has operations in London, Manchester and Liverpool, and, isn’t about to stop there.

The problem, according to Royal Mail, is that TNT can “cherry-pick easy-to-serve urban areas; delivering easy-to-handle post to homes less frequently than Royal Mail and to no defined quality standard”.

In other words, TNT can choose profitable areas while Royal Mail has to deliver throughout the whole country. Royal Mail reckons the impact will be revenue reduction by over £200m in 2017-18, and cost cutting to help support margins would be limited given its Universal Service obligation.

Meanwhile, the company can’t go ahead with access price increases, in a bid to plug the hole. That’s because the planned changes to its access contracts (where Royal Mail delivers the so-called final mile of letters sorted by others) is being investigated by regulator Ofcom, following a complaint from TNT.

It’s all very dramatic indeed but as results go, Royal Mail’s wasn’t exactly dismal.

The lack of growth in parcel volumes might’ve been a bone of contention but it’s the company’s warning that caused the jitters.

That warning provided reason to be downbeat – especially as it looks like Ofcom isn’t about to act – and that sentiment’s unlikely to soon subside.

Build your confidence risk free
Join our live webinars for the latest analysis and trading ideas. Register now

StoneX Financial Ltd (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.

No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.

For further details see our full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.