NYSE margin debt decline is far from a sell signal

<p>The increasingly important statistic released by the New York Stock Exchange on month-end margin debt by NYSE-member firms is drawing notice after revealing the first […]</p>

The increasingly important statistic released by the New York Stock Exchange on month-end margin debt by NYSE-member firms is drawing notice after revealing the first decline in eight months. Balances fell 3% to $450.3 bln in March, following eight consecutive monthly gains.

The chart below highlights the relationship between margin debt and stock market performance, as measured by the S&P500. The peak in margin debt seen in March 2000 coincided with the high in the S&P500, but in 2007, the peak in margin debt occurred in July, three months prior to the pre-crisis record highs in equities.

The data suggests the close correlation reflects the increasing use of debt in purchasing stocks by institutional and retail investors, thereby, sheds particularly important light on the circular loop between price performance and the use of margin debt.

Timing and data interpretation

Traders must bear in mind the NYSE statistic is released with a 1-month lag, thus, the March data is out at end of April. Using the example of spring-summer 2011 when stocks fell 22% from their May peak to their October bottom, margin debt turned negative in May 2011, but the data wasn’t available until end of June, by which time had dropped 8% before rebounding an impressive 7% only in the first 10 days of July. Yet, the margin data did predict the extended sell-off to follow as it fell in the ensuing 7 months before turning around in in January 2012.

May 2012 sustained a 10% decline in stocks, which was correctly reflected in a 6% decline in margin debt, but such figures were available in end of June, well after the selloff bottomed out. Sep-Nov 2012 sustained a 9% decline in the S&P500, but margin debt continued to grow for eight straight months until March 2014.

How we used margin debt in January 2008 and October 2008 to forecast further damage in equities

Margin debt can best be utilized for continuation patterns during selloffs rather than timing of turning points. In January 2008, I used the balance figures against the S&P500 to predict additional 25% declines after equities had already fallen by 14%.

Then in October 2008 as stocks had plunged 25% from their 2007 peak, we remained negative on stocks to the extent of predicting further Fed easing against the prevailing market consensus, which leaned towards US rates reaching a bottom at 2.0%.

Looking ahead, equities technical are not anywhere near the dangerous territory seen in summer 2011 or 2007-8 despite doubtful fundamentals. Earnings valuations may be higher than historical averages while earnings growth has clearly tapered off. But making the “day of reckoning” trade prematurely may trigger a self-fulfilling reckoning to trading accounts instead of the market.

NYSE Margin Debt Balances vs S&P500 & DJIA

Join our live webinars for the latest analysis and trading ideas. Register now

GAIN Capital UK Limited (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.

No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.

For further details see our full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.