Next beats Brexit Blues for now

<p>This is not how the ‘picky consumer’ story is ‘meant’ to go. After Next Plc. beat the warning drum again on Wednesday about possibly “the […]</p>

This is not how the ‘picky consumer’ story is ‘meant’ to go.

After Next Plc. beat the warning drum again on Wednesday about possibly “the toughest” year since 2008 (to quote from the retailer’s March statement) its stock rose to the top of the FTSE 100.

For the 3rd time in five months, Britain’s biggest clothing retailer slashed forecasts, now warning that full-price 2016/17 sales could be somewhere between 3.5% lower to 3.5% higher compared with up or down 1% year-on-year.

The downgrade makes sense given current trading. Those much-prized full-priced sales fell 0.9% in the first quarter against the same period a year earlier, towards the bottom of previous guidance. And Next even threw in its near-customary (or infamous depending on your point of view) weather complaint. (This time, “Much colder weather in March and April reduced demand for clothing”.)

Investors seemed bothered by all the above early in the session—the shares fell almost 80p to begin with, but then went on to add well over 6% at their best.

Languishing at the bottom of the list of the FTSE’s worst performers of the year so far will do that for a stock. (Next was still 31% lower YTD at last check, 5%-7% worse than No.99, RBS and No.98, Barclays.)

 

But what pushed the stock into that position in the first place?

 

Next CEO Lord Wolfson, a ‘sitting peer’, but a peerless fit for the term ‘City grandee’, has certainly not been backward about potential reasons. Among other portentous notes he sounded in March, Wolfson also pointed out that growth in real UK earnings had slowed sharply over 6 months, while growth in output across services, manufacturing and construction all decelerated throughout 2015.

 

But, the Conservative Member of the House of Lords has studiously avoided pinning the blame for consumer tardiness on a steady stream of signs pointing to economic uncertainty over the June vote on EU membership.

 

“I don’t think anybody consciously says ‘look I’m not going to buy that dress’ because we might leave the EU’. My instinct is it’s not affecting consumer sentiment”, Wolfson said in March.  True, UK retail sales posted their 35th straight month of year-on-year growth that month. But unemployment rising for the first time in 7 months in April, and the economy turning in an even more anaemic 0.4% growth in Q1 than 0.6% in Q4, at the very least can’t be ignored, in assessing consumer confidence.

Lord Wolfson does of course support ‘Brexit’ in a personal capacity, though (emphatically) not as CEO of Next.

The distinct punishment investors have meted out to Next shares would have to be something akin to a coincidence, in that case.

Even though Next had fallen far further in the year-to-date than the next comparable FTSE 100 retailer, Marks & Spencer, which was down 7.2% for the year at last check.

The UK’s No.2 clothing seller—which has failed to grow those sales for 20 near-consecutive quarters—is of course just as exposed to sterling revenues, as Next.

Either way, after a few weeks of calm, sterling options traders retooled on Wednesday.

A key gauge of volatility (see below) saw its biggest jump since the trade went off the boil last month.

 

DAILY CHART: 3-MONTH IMPLIED VOLATILITY IN GBP/USD OPTIONS

GBPUSD 3-MONTH VOL 4TH MAY 2016 1716BST

Source: Thomson Reuters, City Index

 

Vol. is still way off the mid-April highs that coincided with enhanced market jitters over a Brexit.

But if it’s anything like a barometer, sensitive shares, like banks and retailers, including Next, might soon lag the market even further.

 

 

Join our live webinars for the latest analysis and trading ideas. Register now

GAIN Capital UK Limited (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.

No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.

For further details see our full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.