Morrisons ordered to clarify price comparisons

<p>The ASA says the supermarket must provide better transparency regarding its loyalty card scheme. </p>

The Advertising Standards Authority has ordered Morrisons to clarify its price comparisons under its loyalty card scheme.

In October, the UK's fourth largest supermarket launched its Match & More loyalty card programme, where customers earn points if parts of a shop would have been cheaper at another supermarket. The points are then transferred to money-off vouchers that are printed at the till.

However, critics of the scheme have said that it is too complicated and that the supermarket does not provide customers with enough information about where they could get better deals.

The Advertising Standards Agency (ASA) was brought in to investigate following a number of complaints from discount grocer Aldi – one of the rival supermarkets that Morrisons compares its prices to – as well as the public.

The complaints included:

  • Morrisons could not compare some products because they were too different
  • ​The company did not make clear all of the elements of the scheme
  • A £15 minimum spend was necessary
  • That credit would be awarded in points, rather than cash
  • Points were awarded for the overall difference on an entire shop, rather than individual items

ASA investigation

Following a ten-month investigation, the ASA told Morrisons that it must clearly tell customers where they could find more details about the Match & More scheme – specifically, how points relating to the scheme had been awarded for a specific shop and which products have been compared with which competitor.

The ASA dismissed most of the issues. In a 13-page ruling, it explained: "We concluded that the ads did not misleadingly omit information or give a misleading impression of how the price-match scheme worked.

"We further concluded that, because Morrisons compared products that met the same need or were intended for the same purpose and the products were matched in-line with consumer expectations and Morrisons' guidelines, the ads were not misleading and did not breach the [advertising] code on that basis."

The ASA also said that the way Morrisons compared products had been consistent.

However, the watchdog upheld one complaint – that Morrisons had breached the advertising code because it did not provide sufficient information for customers and competitors to verify its claim the loyalty card matched prices against Aldi, as well as Lidl, Tesco, Sainsbury's and Asda.

"We did not consider Morrisons had provided a clearly signposted facility for customers who had shopped with them to obtain readily, specific details of what products had been compared, and what prices, to explain how the points total had been calculated," it concluded.

Morrisons chief executive David Potts, who joined the company in March, said the loyalty scheme is under review.

On Wednesday afternoon (August 26th), Morrions shares were up 0.96 per cent to 168.50p.

Join our live webinars for the latest analysis and trading ideas. Register now

GAIN Capital UK Limited (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.

No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.

For further details see our full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.