Mining watch: Anglo and BHP risks in focus

<p>Investors are finding it difficult to discover many solid reasons to keep adding Anglo American and BHP Billiton shares, following their results on Tuesday.</p>

Investors are finding it difficult to discover many solid reasons to keep adding Anglo American and BHP Billiton shares, following results on Tuesday.

This tardiness partly relates to the fact that Anglo’s shares advanced almost 300% in 2016 on the back of a tough diet of operational slimming and leverage shedding, and BHP’s rose by a more moderate 60% due to similar actions.

As well, Anglo notes it succeeded in reducing net debt by 34% to $8.5bn in its financial year. That’s better than the group’s stated target of $10bn, though we have recently regarded the goal as more of a guide, particularly as Anglo has looked on track to hit it for months. The picture is similar in terms of attributable free cash flow and underlying core earnings (Ebitda), up from a negative result to $2.6bn in 2016 and improved by a quarter on the year before to $6.1bn respectively.

Shareholders appear to be treating news that Anglo wants to reinstate the dividend in similar fashion. After all, the return of regular shareholder pay outs would be the logical outcome from the group’s laudable improvement during the financial year and was also to be expected.

The stock settled a few pennies lower as investors opted to wait for more details to be released about the group’s intention to upgrade its mining asset portfolio, and the extent of advantages Anglo expects for financing costs, from a planned return to investment grade rating.

As for BHP’s half-year highlights, it reported underlying profit that is almost up 8 times year-on-year and a higher-than-expected dividend. It was telling that after all that, its own shares rose just 5.5p (0.4%).

In its case, arch rival Rio Tinto had already paved the way for a trend of rising pay-outs with its own bumper dividend and buyback package earlier in the month. At BHP too, productivity and free cash flow generation are up and net debt significantly reduced, as planned. The group continues to place the balance sheet front and centre though, and has remained cautious with respect to investments, even as it restates its “commitment to strong cash returns” and makes tentative new investments in exploration and project feasibility.

For both BHP and Anglo, the question in shareholders minds is ‘how sustainable is the pace of improvement?’ particularly with low hanging fruit in terms of costs and debt now largely out of the way.

For mining stock investors, especially those in BHP and Rio, the Escondida stoppages—which are having a production impact that the groups have yet to quantify—are a reminder of the multifarious environment of unpredictability miners operate in.

Particularly while miners’ recoveries are relatively recent, such outages and other unforeseeable factors pose risks to the continuing advance of their shares this year.

Join our live webinars for the latest analysis and trading ideas. Register now

GAIN Capital UK Limited (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.

No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.

For further details see our full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.