Manufacturing PMI Gets Even Uglier, But Is It The End Of The World? | DJT, FDX

It was another ugly data set from the ISM manufacturing read, but it may not mean we’re headed for a full-blown recession.

It was another ugly data set from the ISM manufacturing read, but it may not mean we’re headed for a full-blown recession.

If last month’s data was ugly, then this is even uglier. Not only have the headline PMI, new orders and production contracted at their fastest pace since the great recession, employment is its lowest since 2007 and exports fell off a cliff. On the backdrop of global growth concerns, this only exacerbates these fears and resulted in the S&P500 shedding -1.2% and USD/JPY printing a potential top and basically slamming risk appetite. Whilst this has seen further calls for a recession, we’d want to see the service PMI read also tank before placing that bet.  

ISM Manufacturing PMI data remains a firm favourite for predicting recessions, as it has done an excellent job since its inception since 1948 (albeit a few false signals). Yet times are changing. Data from the world bank suggests that as of 2017, the US Services sector accounted for over 77% of GDP. Therefor Services PMI could warrant a closer look in tandem with manufacturing PMI, to better access whether the US in fact is headed towards, or already, in a recession.

Upon first inspection, a clear divergence appears between the two; services PMI remains firmly expansive whilst manufacturing is contracting at its fastest rate since 2009. So, which one is correct?

Service PMI has remained expansive since the last recession in late 2009, whilst manufacturing PMI has provided two false signals in 2012 and 2016 (we’ll ignore the marginal, 1-month contractions around these key dates). On both occasions, service PMI remain defiantly expansive and the US did not head into recession.

However, when growth momentum for manufacturing declined between 2004 – 2008 and ultimately predicted a recession, service PMI weakened in tandem, essentially confirming the broad scale deterioration of the broader economy. Yet this doesn’t seem apparent this time around.

That said, the spread between manufacturing-service PMI is reaching levels which usually prompts mean reversion which leaves the following scenarios:

  1. Service PMI drops to close the gap
  2. Manufacturing bounces to close the gap, or
  3. They meet somewhere in the middle.

Two out of those three likely end with both in expansive territory, so perhaps we’re not heading to the end of the world in recessionary terms yet.

Still, a weak manufacturing PMI is clearly bad for that sector. So should come as no major surprise to see the Dow Jones Transportation Index falling over -2.3%. The iShares Transportation ETF has been ranging between ~175 – 200 since April, but momentum is pointing lower and prices appear to be headed for the lows. Given the bad numbers from manufacturing PMI, we’d expect the index to head for and break beneath 175 over the coming week/s.


Since the prior analysis, FedEx has broken out of a small, bearish pennant and the June 2016 low. The mixture of the trade war and contracting manufacturing are likely to weigh on the stock without a solid turnaround in sentiment, so we remain bearish. Over the near-term we’d like too 147.82 hold as resistance, although we could also use 154.57 as a more conservative approach for risk management. For now, we’re waiting to see if the stock can, make its way down to the January 2016 low.  



Related analysis:
Weaker ISM is Just What the DXY Needed
USD/JPY Fails to Take Out Recent Highs, Reverses
The Closer You Look At ISM's PMI, The Uglier It Gets | EUR/USD, USD/CHF
It's A Fine Line Between Bullish & Bearish on S&P500 | Apple, Netflix
Whilst FedEx Sounds The Alarm For Global Trade, Can UBS Weather The Storm? | FDX, UPS

Build your confidence risk free
Join our live webinars for the latest analysis and trading ideas. Register now

StoneX Financial Ltd (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.

No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.

For further details see our full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.