A group of Silicon Valley tech firms have reached a settlement over non-poaching.
Apple, Google, Intel and Adobe have signed a $415 million (£273.5 million) agreement in an attempt to resolve a lawsuit. The settlement will see the companies prevented from poaching staff from each other. It follows allegations in the US lawsuit that the staff members were prevented from taking better job offers from a firm's rivals.
The revision in the settlement still requires the approval of US District Court Judge Lucy Koh, who had previously reject an earlier deal. The previous agreement was deemed to have insufficient damages paid to the plaintiffs. This has been built on in the new lawsuit which has been increased by $90.5 million.
Launched in 2011, the US case had claimed $3 billion in damages representing over 64,000 workers at the four tech firms. After the first settlement was deemed to be too low, the companies could have potentially owed $9 billion under US antitrust laws had they lost the case. The lawsuit focuses around emails sent between executives of the major firms and has generated huge interest.
Apple, Google, Intel and Adobe are four of the biggest companies within the tech sector generating billions in revenue every year. As a result their employees have become hot property for other companies within the industry. The court case has surrounded these organisations attempting to poach the best employees from a rival.
One alleged email has generated major interest. According to some reports, the exchange cited in the lawsuit involves former Google chief executive Eric Schmidt telling former Apple boss Steve Jobs that a Google recruiter who had solicited an Apple employee would be fired.
Reuters quoted the court filing as saying: "Schmidt responded that he preferred it be shared 'verbally, since I don't want to create a paper trail over which we can be sued later?'"
Find up to date information on the FTSE 100 and spread betting strategies at City Index.
GAIN Capital UK Limited (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.
No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.