Lloyds Bank stuck in a Brexit trap
Ken Odeluga October 26, 2016 5:10 PM
<p>Profits are largely unchanged year-on-year, but the early share price sell-off of some 3% on Wednesday tells us Lloyds Bank’s very patient investors aren’t pleased. […]</p>
Profits are largely unchanged year-on-year, but the early share price sell-off of some 3% on Wednesday tells us Lloyds Bank’s very patient investors aren’t pleased.
At a few points during the quarter to the end of September, there have certainly been grounds to fear that underlying profit would slide below the £1.97bn level booked in Q3 last year.
However we notice consensus in recent weeks had been inching well above the £1.912bn underlying net income the group has reported.
Hopes have been rising that the absence of a clear structural economic hit and (probably) delayed fallout from the collapse of the pound would mean a relatively unhindered LBG performance in Q3.
In the event, comparable profits look as much as 9.3% light of the typical City forecast, and 3% weaker than the ‘flat’ view.
Furthermore, there’s no additional announcement of self-help (also known as cost measures) having taken place within the bank during the quarter, even if we recognise that management probably thought it prudent to hold fire whilst the dust to settled, and to keep a rein on sentiment.
Lloyds’ CFO Culmer has simply pledged this morning that “there is more to come”.
Perhaps the most positive note is the signal from the group’s CFO that its latest PPI provision of £1bn is the final one the bank expects to take given that it is intended to cover the period up until the recently pushed-back deadline.
In the meantime of course, it is that very payment which has taken a big bite out of profits and, potentially, prevented Lloyds from taking as much advantage as possible from what still looks set to be a delayed hit from the referendum outcome.
Looking deeper into this morning’s figures and then looking further ahead, the crucial Return on Equity figure—that will probably be the decider on profitability and dividends going forward—remains problematic.
Unadjusted (as presented by the bank) it probably is a little over 1%.
If we wash out the effect of the new PPI provision (assuming 12 quarters of amortised installments till 2019) , a one-off corporation tax hit, and even fail to give LBG the benefit of the doubt that a £150m packaged accounts provision won’t recur, then ROE looks more viable around 11%, meaning above real financing costs.
The question is, how do we adjust for Brexit?
With difficulty, not least because it’s quite the unknown.
For now, shareholders can be expected to simply be thankful for the group’s good fortune—the shares have duly recouped most of their sharper loss on Wednesday morning.
Lloyds numbers can also serve as a benchmark for the other UK-focused giant lenders that will report his week, Barclays and RBS.
Working out relative performance won’t be easy of course, due to the now routine obfuscation of ‘one-off’ items.
But any hint that they’ve taken a bigger hit than LBG won’t play well.
From a technical chart perspective, Lloyds shares are making another attempt to rise above ‘post-Brexit vote’ resistance around 56p (38.2% of the tumble to a bottom of 47p between 23rd June and 6th July).
- The stock is completing a symmetrical triangle pattern, which would traditionally be bullish, though better prospects would be offered had the ‘breakout’ already occurred.
- Further confirmation would be found from a successful exit from the top side of the resistance band between 53p and 57p.
- The lower line of the triangle can be connected to peaks and lows all the way back to November 2011, but its status as support has been clearest since late June.
- Obviously, the lower trend needs to hold to avoid another approach to July 2016 lows
Please click image to enlarge
GAIN Capital UK Limited (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.
No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.