Glencore shares stuck well below asset value
Ken Odeluga March 1, 2016 7:48 PM
<p>Glencore’s end of year report was bereft of major negative surprises, though attempts to ‘hang tough’ on how fast it needs to sell assets to […]</p>
Glencore’s end of year report was bereft of major negative surprises, though attempts to ‘hang tough’ on how fast it needs to sell assets to cut debt, tipped its shares into the red.
Updated on 3rd March to correct tangible book value following new information published by Reuters
A touch of defiance
The group’s £8.69bn adjusted EBITDA was a little above forecasts, adjusted EBIT a tad below, at $2.1bn.
The near-infamous trading unit, in the spotlight due to murky visibility and reliance on short-term credit, also got a tick.
‘Marketing’—Glencore’s name for its commodities dealer—booked adjusted EBITDA and EBIT down 11% and 12% to $2.66bn and $2.46bn respectively—within tolerable range of forecasts.
The $4.96bn net loss may have surprised a few optimists, though it was mixed signals on how aggressive the group plans to be on asset sales, aimed at slashing debt, that brought a halt to the stock’s two-day rally.
Ag to stay mostly in bag
Glencore said late last year it was targeting net debt—on the basis of its own adjustments—of $18bn, compared with $30bn in June.
On Tuesday, the group said net debt had been reduced to about $26bn.
However investors were taken aback by CEO Ivan Glasenburg’s insistence that the group would not sell “more than 50%” of the agriculture business.
Glencore’s stake in the farming commodities unit—once valued at $10.5bn—had been mooted as a key plank for plans to get out of a hole.
Glencore did announce expanded asset disposals on Tuesday, pledging $4bn-$5bn more in disposals on top of $1.6bn already done.
But $5bn now looks like the maximum possible from disposal of a small ag unit stake.
Glencore’s reduced debt would then in all probability be on target, instead of well ahead of target, as investors had clearly hoped.
Don’t mention RMI
Naturally, in these scenarios we’re not revisiting the issue of ‘Readily Marketable Inventories’.
Even if we take Glencore’s version of net debt—and treat commodity inventory as ‘cash’ and irrelevant for net debt—there’s no escaping from total impairments of $7.1bn in 2015.
Its asset values are sliding.
It will need to ‘pedal faster’ in what’s turning out to be a buyer’s market for distressed commodity assets.
After undoubted progress on production costs, spending and—with provisos—debt, Glencore’s margin for error is falling.
We therefore think it’s too early to get particularly optimistic on Glencore shares.
We note the price has doubled for a second time from lows hit in the dark days of September.
With a tangible book value per share currently around $2.34 (about 166p), according to data from Thomson Reuters, speculation on a price at least equivalent to the group’s physical worth could well have begun, judging by the recent advance.
Whether such optimism is timely or too early is the next key question.
In turn, the answer will hinge on how much faith is placed in the commodity sector’s recent ‘revival’.
Or rather what may soon pass as one, looking at Reuters’ ‘Core Commodity’ indices, which have crept about 6% higher over the last fortnight.
From a technical perspective, GLEN is making its third attempt to breach proven resistance above 132p and more precisely between 138p and 139p.
Please click image to enlarge
To be sure, the price may have bottled the attempt already, which becomes even clearer in the four-hourly interval chart below.
Please click image to enlarge
For the bull case, despite tardiness, GLEN’s rise from re-tested lows in January looks to be its most constructive yet, with supports established and proven at several steps along the way.
These consolidations imply support if required in the event of a reversal.
The stock has largely travelled within a clear channel too.
And Fibonacci retracement markers of the drift back to lows between October and January have been respected on the rebound, bolstering support.
I’d still be wary of calling a breach of 139p in the near term, even if current momentum was not waning, though it is.
StoneX Financial Ltd (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.
No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.