GBP/AUD: More Sterling troubles vs Aussie
City Index January 29, 2013 12:00 AM
<p>One central bank nears the end of its easing cycle, while the other is set to start a new wave of quantitative easing. The former […]</p>
One central bank nears the end of its easing cycle, while the other is set to start a new wave of quantitative easing. The former may no longer worry about the spillover from a Chinese hard landing, while the latter is dealing with the fourth negative quarterly growth over the last six quarters. The first is none other than the Reserve Bank of Australia and the latter is the Bank of England.
The strength of the Aussie lies in its ability to remain underpinned above 1.02 during most of the last six months despite an aggressive easing campaign from May to December 2012. And the primary reason to the currency’s resilience is that the RBA’s easing was mainly aimed at reining Aussie strength, instead of stabilising macro fundamentals. Last year’s announcement by the IMF to include the Aussie in its reserve currency data dealt a sharp boost to the currency and confirmed what was already going on-global central banks had began accumulating the Aussie into their reserves as a safe alternative to the QE-driven currencies.
And even if there is a 35-40% chance of an RBA cut next month, Aussie macro metrics are not flashing any danger lights despite cooling off in copper and minerals resource. Thus, one last rate cut of 25-bps may well trigger a positive Aussie reaction was the case back in December when the easing by the same magnitude boosted the currency on the revelation that the RBA was moved by concerns of currency strength rather than the local of global macro picture.
Sterling’s recent woes are result of the renewed dip in growth, seen in Q4 GDP, which fell 0.3% after an Olympics-driven 0.9% jump in Q3. The Q3 recovery is especially suspected to be a result of special factors considering growth fell 0.4%, 0.2% and 0.3% in Q2 2012, Q1 2012 and Q4 2011. BoE governor Mervyn King (due to leave office in June) asserted the Bank was ready to provide more stimulus if needed. Those remarks were issued shortly after he responded to his successor-to-be Mark Carney, who has advocated targeting nominal GDP (growth minus inflation), seen as a possible attack on the BoE’s 16-year old policy of targeting inflation. Either way, FX markets can see through King’s pronouncements that he is in favour of further weakness in sterling rather than its appreciation.
Looking ahead, we expect further weakness in GBP/AUD, with the break below 1.49 expected by mid quarter, followed by further declines towards 1.47—the trendline support extending from last March. Any recovery is seen limited at 1.5220.
StoneX Financial Ltd (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.
No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.