FTSE trades above 5800 level on retail strength

<p>The FTSE 100 broke back above the 5800 level this morning, having previously met resistance at this level earlier in the week, as retail stocks […]</p>

The FTSE 100 broke back above the 5800 level this morning, having previously met resistance at this level earlier in the week, as retail stocks such as Next, Kingfisher and Marks and Spencer’s surged higher in early trade.

It has been the high demand for retail stocks this morning, coupled with continued support from the miners on higher commodity prices that have helped to charge the FTSE 100 Index back above the 5800 level. The UK Index may struggle however with resistance around the 5875 level but should it break above 5900, it could pave the way for a retest of the psychologically important 6000 level.

European stock waters have appeared undisturbed by the growing fiscal instability within Portugal with PM Socrates handing in his resignation after a crucial austerity vote failed last night. It is hard to see the indebted nation not requiring an Ireland or Greek style bailout without a widely agreed austerity plan. However, I get the feeling that traders are digesting this news without much surprise and are comforted by a belief that the EFSF fund has more than enough cash to help Portugal. The one that traders live in real fear of is if Spain were to head into a similar path to that of Portugal.

We have had several good retail stories combining today to lift the sector some 3% in London. Next shares have rallied straight to the top of the FTSE 100 leader board after the high street retailer met forecasts with a 9% jump in yearly profits and hiked its dividend by 18%. The retailer also pleased shareholders by stating that they are likely to continue to generate surplus cash which could be used for share buybacks or dividend hikes.  Shares in Kingfisher were similarly bullish today after the firm reported a 23% increase in full year profits. Kingfisher also hiked their dividend by 28%, a factor always enjoyed by shareholders. Marks and Spencer’s shares joined the retail band wagon also, with traders buying into its shares in a sector wide move.

UK Retail Sales slump more than expected in February
However, data which showed that retail sales in the UK slumped 0.8% in February, slightly more than the market had expected, threw the cat amongst the pigeons somewhat. In reaction to this we saw some minimal early profit taking in retail stocks and traders also sold the pound sterling, which fell 0.5% against the dollar.

Join our live webinars for the latest analysis and trading ideas. Register now

GAIN Capital UK Limited (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.

No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.

For further details see our full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.