Election Scenario Analysis of the Markets

<p>We avoid making simplistic if-then scenario analysis on the US elections for US equities, solely based on the notion that a Democrat president is negative […]</p>

We avoid making simplistic if-then scenario analysis on the US elections for US equities, solely based on the notion that a Democrat president is negative for stocks and a Republican victory is a positive due the presence of three major elements:

1) Potentially positive market implications of Obama keeping pro-QE Bernanke, likely offsetting classical partisan implications for equities.

2) Implications of Romney threatening trade war retaliation with China as a consequence of labelling Beijing as a currency manipulator (which is a USD negative).

3) Interaction between the new White House and Congressional balance of power and its impact on averting the Fiscal Cliff.

The least ambiguous scenario analysis from the US presidential elections is that a Romney victory would be deemed a negative for gold and metals due to the Governor’s plan not to re-appoint Fed Chairman Bernanke when his term expires in January 2014. Considering Fed Chairman Bernanke’s explicit support for ongoing quantitative easing, which could extend into mid 2014 (until unemployment drops below 7.0%), removing Bernanke and his dovish supporters would likely sustain serious damage to gold and possibly boost the US dollar (in the event that Romney does not push China into a trade retaliation to his labelling them as currency manipulators).

If Romney threatens a trade action with China, as did Bush in February 2002 with his trade war on foreign steel, it would be a de-facto negative for the US currency. Recall that February 2002 marked the top of the US dollar despite prevailing so-called ‘strong dollar policy’ by Treasury Secretary O’Neill.

The implications for metals are especially magnified by the threat of the potential fiscal cliff; the combined expiration of the Bush era tax cuts; and across-the-board spending cuts in the event that Congress takes no action to avert it by end of year. Both of the spending cuts and the removal of the Bush tax cuts are expected to remove $607 billion from the US economy, or 4-5% of total GDP. Such a bite from the world’s biggest economy is estimated to drag down growth to 1.0% in the first half, before possibly printing a 2.0% contraction in the first quarter.

The above is magnified by the possibility that Romney could well ask Bernanke to resign instead of waiting until January 2014.

Aside from the Presidential race, the balance of power in Congress could also be crucial. A Congressional status quo (Democrat-led Senate and Republican-led House of Representatives), combined with a Romney victory may reduce the odds of the fiscal cliff but is likely to ease the way for a Bernanke ouster.

The worst case scenario for gold and metals would then be a Romney victory with no change in the House and the loss of further Republican seats in the Senate but without the Republicans gaining more seats in the Chamber.

The combination of a Romney victory and persistent budgetary stalemate in Congress would have a negative knee-jerk reaction throughout the metals complex. Gold has already lost half of the gains accumulated this summer. It could lose a lot more this quarter, and risk testing the $1600 territory.



Build your confidence risk free
Join our live webinars for the latest analysis and trading ideas. Register now

StoneX Financial Ltd (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.

No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.

For further details see our full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.