Budget: ‘Spreadsheet Phil’ no market-mover
City Index March 8, 2017 7:01 PM
<p>The Chancellor’s last Spring Budget has had a fairly muted impact on the markets. There were no surprises, the budget was fiscally neutral, and not […]</p>
The Chancellor’s last Spring Budget has had a fairly muted impact on the markets. There were no surprises, the budget was fiscally neutral, and not even decent upgrades to this year’s growth forecast or a rosier fiscal outlook could boost the pound, which has at the time of writing managed to retrace only 38% of the earlier sell off in GBP/USD.
Pound recovery cut short by whopping ADP report
There are two reasons for this small reaction in GBP to the Budget: firstly, the pound was knocked by a strong ADP report for February, which boosted the US dollar. Spread-sheet Phil, couldn’t compete with a whopping ADP report, 298k jobs were created in the US’s private sector in Feb, expectations were for a 187k increase. This is the strongest reading since 2014, and, if followed by a strong NFP report on Friday, will almost guarantee a rate hike from the Fed next week. In contrast, the Chancellor has all but made a rate hike from the BOE impossible by maintaining a tight fiscal stance for the rest of this Parliament.
Are the OBR forecasts too optimistic?
The second is slightly more concerning for the pound’s prospects for recovery. Although the OBR revised up its growth forecast for this year to 2% from 1.4% in November, public sector borrowing is set to continue to fall for the next three years, and the UK is set to meet its EU deficit limit this year, with forecasts for our deficit to be 2.6% of GDP this fiscal year; UK asset prices don’t appear to be impressed. Are these deficit forecasts too rosy, especially if Brexit negotiations take a turn for the worse, requiring more fiscal support for the economy?
Hammond kicks the can down the road to the Autumn Budget
Hammond has commissioned a lot of papers, for example on business rates relief and support to boost North Sea oil production, this suggests that the big announcements will have to wait for the next Budget in the autumn. Thus, Hammond managed to kick the can down the road with this Budget, which may also be a reason for the muted response from the market.
In terms of the market response, it appears to have been sell GBP on the Budget rumour, with limited GBP buying on the Budget fact. However, after starting Wednesday as one of the weakest performers in the G10, the pound is now middle of the pack. So the Chancellor, whose nickname could be changed to fiscally-neutral Phil, did manage to stem the flow out of the pound. His talk of balancing the books, boosting the UK’s fiscal position and inflation-busting wage increases over the course of this parliament, did go down relatively well with the pound. But, we doubt that Hammond’s Budget will reverse all of Wednesday’s losses in GBP/USD, which could see the tenth consecutive loss for cable, the longest losing streak since September 2008.
GBP/USD: 1.20 still calling
The outlook for the pound also looks shaky, the ADP report has widened the UK-US yield spread further into negative territory. This yield spread has a strong positive correlation with the pound, so another record decline in the yield spread could trigger further GBP/USD weakness in the medium-term, and 1.20 is still a key target for GBP/USD.
StoneX Financial Ltd (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.
No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.