BAE Systems and EADS scrap merger plans after German opposition
City Index October 10, 2012 9:54 PM
<p>BAE Systems and EADS announced today, four hours short of the 5pm deadline, that they had terminated their proposed £30bn merger in the face of […]</p>
BAE Systems and EADS announced today, four hours short of the 5pm deadline, that they had terminated their proposed £30bn merger in the face of political opposition.
The breakdown in the deal of course is not a huge shock given the weight of German opposition to a number of factors surrounding the merger, specifically shareholder equality, job cuts and a headquarters in Munich. Both companies confirmed that “it became clear that the interests of the parties’ government stakeholders cannot adequately be reconciled with each other or with the objectives of BAE and EADS.”
Given how long it is taking European governments to agree on measures to improve the eurozone debt crisis, it is hardly surprising that with national interests at stake over this deal, they have failed to reach a compromise in the month since the September announcement of talks between BAE and EADS regarding a merger.
Yet still many in the market felt that they would request an extension to today’s deadline to give the talks further breathing space and so the quick end to talks is a bit of surprise. The fact that both companies have decided to walk away now rather than opt for an extension to the merger being agreed insinuates that German opposition to the deal was immovable and had no hope of a compromise.
Both respective share prices of BAE and EADS rallied in the immediate reaction to the official confirmation that the deal was off. BAE shares rallied 6p to 325p before falling back when investors digested the news, whilst EADS shares rallied 3%.
Ian King’s position as CEO now vulnerable
The immediate focus now switches to the strength of the BAE Systems board and indeed of Ian King with major shareholder Invesco, which owns 13.3% of BAE, already voicing strong opposition to both the merger and the current strategy of the BAE board itself.
In such a public collapse of the BAE/EADS merger, the position of Ian King as CEO of BAE is now particularly vulnerable unless he can convince shareholders that despite this significant setback, BAE’s strategy is on the right path.
StoneX Financial Ltd (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.
No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.