Argos’s catalogue of missteps slams Home Retail shares
Ken Odeluga January 15, 2015 10:11 PM
<p>A frenzy of discounting among UK retailers has backfired badly for two high-profile shop chains in the last couple of days, sending their shares spiralling downwards. […]</p>
A frenzy of discounting among UK retailers has backfired badly for two high-profile shop chains in the last couple of days, sending their shares spiralling downwards.
Home Retail Group, which owns high street ‘catalogue’ shop chain Argos, was the latest to see massive discounts explode in its face.
Its shares traded as much as 8.5% lower on Thursday as investors reacted negatively to the margin impact from its promos.
Home Retail also owns DIY chain Homebase.
At Argos, sales growth was virtually flat between 13th August and 3rd January, even though sales were catapulted 45% higher on ‘Black Friday’ versus comparable days.
13.5 million customers visited Argos online. That’s triple the number from the year before, the company said.
Despite the surge, Home Retail said pre-tax profit for the year ending in February would be in line with expectations, but Argos and Homebase Christmas missed targets, the company said.
Home Retail seemed concerned about the effect that unprecedented promotional price cuts on ‘Black Friday’ late in November might have on trading as Christmas drew nearer.
Home Retail stopped discounting, but it was too late
In response to those concerns, Home Retail said it had taken a much more cautious approach to discounting in the period after the one-day sales drive in November.
Home Retail’s CEO suggested the group’s decision had in fact saved it from a worse outcome from Christmas trading.
“It would (have been) easy to get into a position where everything is on sale and everything gets cherry picked and you end up with a real profit problem and that was the challenge we tried to avoid,” John Walden said at a press conference.
Later the firm reiterated during a conference call with analysts that it continued to expect group profit before tax for its current year ending in February to be in line with the market consensus of £127m.
Either way, investors were not pleased and its stock still closed with a significant loss of 6.1%.
Let’s face it, its missteps during the most important selling period of the year led to the group over-reaching itself and at best, all that can be salvaged is pre-tax profit of £127m.
(In fact, in the wake of Home Retail’s statement today, consensus forecasts have been trimmed to £122m.)
The earnings hit may concentrate investor minds about HRG, when it’s considered against close peers which are expected to return 3.3% in terms of prospective yield—Home Retail’s forward yield is 1.9%—and even 4% if we take in Marks & Spencer to the group.
The latter trades on a more modest 13.5 times forward price/earnings ratio, versus 16.7 by HRG.
Home Retail stock almost avoided the magnetic compulsion of an important moving average today, though after a spike in volume activity bigger than any visible since January 2013, and as momentum indicators invert, it seems the share will trend lower from here.
Zooming out to the weekly view, there was already suggestion of a confluence of overhead coming up, including an important 61.8 retracement mark of the fall from 2007 highs to lows of about 85p.
StoneX Financial Ltd (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.
No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.