Apple shares higher as patent dispute with HTC is settled

<p>Shares in Apple closed higher last week ahead of a settlement with HTC over patent disputes.</p>

Shares in Apple closed higher on Wall Street last week before a key patent dispute between the Californian technology firm and rival HTC was settled.

Yesterday (November 11th), the two companies signed a ten-year licence agreement extending to current and future patents held by either business, putting and end to an impasse that began in March 2010.

Apple – which is also embroiled in multiple legal battles with Samsung around the world – has been fighting more than 20 cases against HTC, according to AFP.

Head of HTC Peter Chou said of the settlement: "HTC is pleased to have resolved its dispute with Apple, so HTC can focus on innovation instead of litigation."

The iPhone maker and its rivals have been suing and countersuing for years, accusing one another of copying designs, technology and ideas in a bid to gain supremacy in the highly lucrative smartphone arena.

At close of play on Friday, Apple advanced on the Nasdaq by 1.7 per cent to a value of $547.06.

Find out about the Nasdaq and CFD trading at City Index.

Build your confidence risk free
Join our live webinars for the latest analysis and trading ideas. Register now

StoneX Financial Ltd (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.

No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.

For further details see our full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.